SALVATION BOSTON STYLE
Part 2 In a Series on the Boston Church of Christ
Boston 1979. A group of 30 would-be disciples gather in a living room and commit themselveslves to, at the time, an idea that had not yet been seen. That the true church would be composed of only disciples, only those people that are totally committed to Jesus Christ. And those that REFUSE to heed the call of Jesus would be unwelcomed in that fellowship and not recognized by God or His human leaders. That was radical!
“In
’82 we said we’re not gonna send our young men and out young women that we
train into existing congregations. We
have got to build churches where we can preach the word of God free of all
tradition. And so we went to
Chicago. And that was radical!
“We
said we’re not gonna stay here in the United States where the Church of Christ
had dwelt way too long in the rural communities wishing someday to get into the
cities. We’re gonna go to London and build out second church planting on
foreign soil. That, my brother and
my sister, was radical!1
“In 1983 we said listen, we have got to get to the largest English speaking city in the world, New York. We believe that only one church was necessary. One small group of disciples led by spiritual people that knew God. That would be all that would be necessary. All that we needed was just 18 sold-out disciples to go to the city of 18,000,000 and we knew the job would be done because that is God’s plan. That disciples make disciples to make disciples. We didn’t need 45 different autonomous churches. There’s only one church in one city. And that, my friends, was radical.”
These are the words of Kip McKean, leader
of the Boston Church of Christ, now known as the International Churches of
Christ (hereafter, ICC). WE find, in these introductory comments to the 1994
World Leadership Conference in Manila, the driving force behind this movement.
The first thing of note is that the movement was started by “would-be
disciples.” They weren’t
disciples yet, but shortly would be. That
is very important for, in the view of the ICC, one cannot be a Christian until
they are a disciple first. If that
teaching is correct, then the ICC was started by non-Christian men and women.
Kip McKean pointed out in 1982 that the nine “Bible studies” he had
written earlier, what he calls the “first principles,” taught that one had
to be a disciple before one could be baptized.
According to the ICC (as well as the Mainline church of Christ) one
actually becomes a Christian at baptism. Kip
McKean wrote:
“I purposely developed this study
to draw a sharp Biblical distinction between the Lexington (later renamed
Boston) Church of Christ and all other groups.
I taught that to be baptized, you must first make a decision to be a
disciple and then be baptized. I
saw people in and outside of our fellowship had been baptized without this
understanding and then, in time, developed a disciple’s commitment to make
Jesus Lord of their entire life. I
taught that their baptism was invalid because a retroactive understanding of
repentance and baptism was not consistent with Scripture.”2
True
Salvation?
Salvation I the ICC is only achieved by a disciple who had submitted to
the authority of a disciple. Only
when the discipler is convinced that his disciple is completely submitted to his
authority will water baptism be administered. Kip McKean and the others were not
disciples at the time they started the movement and didn’t have a discipler
over them. In fact, there were no
disciples prior to Kip McKean for there were no true Christians prior to Kip and
his band of 30. There was,
therefore, no true Christian to disciple or baptize
them. In this regard, the
ICC has a similar problem to that of the Mainline churches of Christ. They both view themselves as restoring the gospel \(which
presumably got lost in mists of time since the first century) and call
themselves “restoration” churches. The
Mainline churches were started by Thomas and Alexander Campbell who were
baptized by a Baptist. Yet, if we
accept church of Christ teaching, we must understand that a Baptist baptism
simply won’t do! Only a church of
Christ baptism, with a church of Christ understanding that baptism is necessary
to remit sins, is valid to ensure one’s salvation. The Campbell’s did not understand these things until much
later, which invalidates their baptism, leaving them unsaved.
So, according to the prescription for salvation which both groups hold,
they were both started by non-Christians! What’s
more, they never became Christians for there was o one who predated them to
teach or disciple the founders with the true gospel, and without a correct
understanding of repentance and remittance of sins at baptism, there can be no
true conversion.
Some of the earliest and best research and exposure of the ICC was done
by the Mainline churches of Christ. One
of the works is titled. The Discipling
Dilemma, which states, “Many
observers believe that discipling churches delay baptism until the disciplers
are convinced that the prospective converts will submit to their authority
without question. The issue is not
their readiness to obey the gospel, but their willingness to submit to the
control system provided in the discipling system.”3
These authors further write: “Many
people who have come to the discipling churches from other churches of Christ
have been taught by their disciplers that they must be rebaptized.”4
They were not Christians because they were not disciples to the one true
church at the time they were baptized. The
Disciplining Dilemma also points out, “The
psychological function of the rebaptism phenomenon is similar to the
psychological function of the ‘replanting’ terminology used when the Boston
church takes over another congregation: both serve to deny the validity of the
previous religious experience of the individual. This cuts the individual off from his or her roots
spiritually and thus gives the discipler more power to control and change that
individual.”5
The ICC grew out of the Mainline churches of Christ and holds
fundamentally the same doctrine regarding salvation with the addition of the
discipling mandate. The Mainline
churches are attempting to distance themselves from the ICC because they
correctly, if belatedly, perceive the cultic control aspect of the ICC.
Early on the Mainline churches were excited about the growth of the group
and their ability to reach the college-age generation but became concerned over
the abuses they began seeing. Yet,
in our opinion, the Mainline churches of Christ do bear a large part of the
responsibility for the birth and growth of the ICC.
The ICC apple does not fall far from the Mainline churches of Christ tree
when it comes to elitist attitude.
The Mainline churches view themselves as the only true Christians on the
face of the earth and are quite judgmental about other churches.
In view of that, it is ironic that what caused the separation between the
ICC and the Mainline churches is the ICC’s view
the ICC are the only true Christians and that the Mainline churches are
spiritually dead. Commenting on the
“judgmental attitude” of the ICC, the Mainline church of Christ, authors of The
Discipling Dilemma, lament the ICC injustice of “telling
new converts that other churches of Christ in the area are dead, that they are
not spiritual, or that they could not provide the discipling the new converts
need. Interviews with over 100 others who have left the Boston church have
convinced me that these judgmental comments about other churches of Christ are
the rule, not the exception.”6
Since the ICC views themselves as the only true church (where have I head
that before?), salvation comes by association with the group. Proper submission
to a discipler includes leaving a job if you are told to by your discipler.
It involves getting permission to date, attending Bible Talk meetings and
numerous other test of submission. Independent
thought is strongly discouraged in order to bring you into complete dependence
on your discipler.
Kip McKean considers the ICC to be “God’s movement” and himself to
be “God’s man.” Papal authority without the big hat.
In 1994, the leaders of an ICC church in Indianapolis expressed concern
about the authoritarianism within the movement.
They were fully dedicated to the teachings of the ICC, but had come to
the realization that the structure was very similar to Roman Catholicism with
Kip McKean as the vicar of Christ on earth.
On February 27, 1994, the Indianapolis church held a congregational
meeting to discuss the problems with the current structure.
They were not advocating pulling out of the movement, but felt that they
should have the ability to make certain decision locally.
They were happy to participate in missions projects, for example, but
desired the freedom, as a local church, to decide at what level they were able
to participate. To illustrate: If
the headquarters of the ICC decreed that they must send $250,000 as Special
Missions giving, and they were only able to raise $200,000, they wanted the
autonomy to obtain. This may seem
like a eminently reasonable request but, as a result of that meeting, the ICC
kicked the Indianapolis church out of the movement, brought in a number of
leaders from Los Angeles, and started another church two weeks alter.
ICC representatives Marty Fuqa and Bob Gempel from Los Angels met with
lead evangelist Ed Powers of the Indianapolis church.
In a tape of the March 8, 1994 congregational meting, an associate of Ed
Powers recounts that Ed asked Marty and Bob if “’last
week, would you agree that we [the Indianapolis church] were part of God’s
kingdom?’ And they all said, ’Yes, I agree that you were a part of God’s
kingdom last week.’ He says, ‘O. K. now this next week we’re gonna keep
doin’ all the things we’ve been doin’.
We’re gonna continue to teach the same thing we’re teaching about how
to become a Christian. O.K., the gospel.’ He said, ‘Will we be a part of
God’s kingdom?’ And again, they did not answer the question.
O.K. And I think that that is a real issue here.
That these men were not willing to say that we would continue to be a
part of God’s kingdom.”7
People who for years had been teaching others that
association with the ICC was necessary for salvation, now found themselves
outside in the cold, cruel world. If
salvation comes by association, then disassociation is spiritual death.
Pope Kip and his Bishops hold the keys to the Kingdom.
I have been correspondence with an individual from the Mainline church of
Christ on the issue of salvation. In
one of his letters, he gave me what he considered to be the five pieces to the
puzzle of salvation. The first
“puzzle piece,” belief in Jesus Christ, is an important part of the
salvation process, but not the whole enchilada.
Repentance is the “second part” of the whole.
The third is confession. Baptism
(church of Christ baptism being the only valid baptism one could have) is the
fourth piece of the puzzle, and Christian living is the fifth and “final
part.”
The ICC would add a sixth piece: Discipleship.
This teaching of discipleship prior to sonship is a bit “puzzling,”
however. How will an unregenerate
person live life as a child of God prior to his new birth?
A person needs to be born again before he can toddle, and he needs to
toddle before he can walk. Yet,
both the Mainline churches of Christ and the ICC put the works car before the
salvation horse. True salvation is
not discipleship before salvation, nor some other combination of the two, but is
by faith alone in Christ alone (Eph 2:8-9 & Acts 4:12).
The abuses of authority within the ICC toward the lowly disciple is
devastating. The first individual I
met who was part of this group had just sold his car at the direction of his
discipler. He was told that he
lived closed enough to work that he didn’t need a car and this loss would help
to keep him humble. The money from he sale of the car was to be given to the ICC
as a Special Missions offering.
The next person I met was a young woman whose husband was a member.
She was desperate because her husband was gone nearly every night of the
week being “discipled.” If he
missed a night, he had to meet his discipler at 5:30 AM for a prayer walk.
Bible studies often lasted until 1:00 or 2:00AM and her husband had
abandoned his responsibilities as a husband and a father.
He had run up the credit cards in order to keep up with the finical
demands of the ICC. Soon, he
remortgaged the house to pay off the credit card debt and then began running up
the credit cards again. This young
mother was at her wit’s end. She
was given $6.00 to $10.00 per week for food and was borrowing from her family to
keep her children fed. She was not
a member of the group herself, and so could not reason with her husband, since
ICC teaches that outsiders are evil and anything written against the group is
“spiritual pornography.”
The teaching of the Apostle Paul is diametrically opposed to this view.
“You foolish Galatians, who has
bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as
crucified? This is the only thing I
want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law,
or by hearing with faith? Are you
so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the
flesh? Even so Abraham BELIEVED
God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness” (Gal. 3-:1-6 NASB)
Paul’s position is that those who teach such a distorted view are bewitching or casting a spell or hypnotizing their follower. The Christian believer is completely justified by grace alone, through faith alone. There is nothing in the gospel either stated or implied about salvation by association with a particular group. In fact, the opposite is true. Salvation only comes by having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ one on one.
Some of the things the ICC promotes legalistically are good things, in
and of themselves. Having a one hour-quite time each day is a good thing.
Meeting regularly with the Body of Christ is a good thing.
Likewise, supporting missions and evangelizing the lost are extremely
important, but all these good things are the fruit of the Christian life, but no
one can follow Christ without the indwelling Holy Spirit, which is given at the
moment of faith and salvation.
The teaching that belief and repentance are two separate “parts of the
puzzle” is completely flawed. Repentance
is a change of direction and is simultaneous and synonymous with belief.
When one moves from unbelief they have at that moment changed direction
or “repented.” In the last
issue of the Journal, Joy wrote and
excellent article on the place of good works in the experience of the Christian.
Salvation is freely imparted by faith, eternal rewards are based on our
actions as a Christian.
1 ) Malachi: God’s Radical Demand for Remaining Radical,” Kip McKean. Delivered at the 1994 Manila World Leadership Conference (#9101)
2 ) (Kip McKean, “Revolution Through Restoration”, Upside Down, April 1992).
3 )The Discipling Dilemma by Howard W. Norton, Don E. Vinzant & Gene Vinzant, edited by Flavil R. Yeakley, Jr., 1988 by Gospel Advocate Company, p 62.
4) Ibid, p 63.
5) Ibid, p 63.
6) Ibid, p 64.
7) Taped Congregational Meeting, Indianapolis Church of Christ, Questions and Answers, March 8, 1994, Tuesday eve., tape 1.